The Routing Stack: When Cascade Models Beat One-Size-Fits-All Inference
By Souriya Khaosanga8 min read
Executive Summary
Most production teams route every large language model (LLM) call through one flagship model because it simplifies eval and avoids "wrong tier" incidents. That default is expensive. A composite workload—support triage, draft generation, and legal escalation—does not need the same inference profile on every request. By implementing a tiered routing stack, a composite operator reduced inference spend by 34%—saving over $16,000 per month—with no measurable drop in quality scores on its highest-volume workflows.
A routing stack beats one-size-fits-all when routing is observable and tied to $/decision. A small classifier or rules layer sends easy requests to a mid-tier model, escalates ambiguous cases to a flagship, and logs every branch. Finance sees which tier paid for which outcome—not a single blended rate hiding 40% overspend on trivial calls.
Figure 1Routing cost by tier
Free preview
Read the full essay
You are seeing a short preview of “The Routing Stack: When Cascade Models Beat One-Size-Fits-All Inference.” Enter your email for a magic link—no account required. Paid plans add ad-free reading plus courses and labs.